OAC E-News – February 1, 2018

According to federal data, the recreational wild striped bass fishery in Massachusetts has been trending downward for 17 years. Maine, New Hampshire, Connecticut and Pennsylvania recognize the economic benefits of managing stripers for their greater value as a recreational species and have banned fishing for them commercially.

Recent NOAA data reveals that: a) recreational striped bass fishing in Massachusetts and our commercial scallop fishery are our two most valuable marine industries; b) recreational striped bass fishing is more economically valuable to Massachusetts than all our other commercial fin-fisheries combined; c) the value of the commercial striped bass fishery represents less than one half of one percent of all our commercial fin-fisheries.

Conclusion: Recreational striped bass fishing has a much greater impact on our overall economy than most people realize, and that current management’s commercial priorities are misdirected.

The key point that is so often overlooked in this discussion is not who kills the fish but rather what goal and purpose is the fishery being managed for. This is not an allocation debate; it is a management policy debate.

There is a striped bass management bill (H466) currently under consideration in the Legislature that will establish new management goals requiring that the wild striped bass fishery be managed for its greatest economic value. Doing so would, over time, make wild stripers a recreational-only game species through the gradual attrition of commercial permits. Managing wild striped bass as a game species in Massachusetts, according to NOAA data, could help us restore our once $1 billion annual recreational striper fishing industry and generate up to 4,000 new jobs. This is serious business especially for our coastal economies. We should not be ignoring it or pretending that all is well.

This bill, unlike similar bills before it, allows qualifying commercial fishermen to continue harvesting stripers while eliminating those permit holders who are recreational fishermen pretending to be commercial fishermen — “recromercials” — that are taking personal advantage of a broken system.

In 2005, the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries wrote in its newsletter that “… the commercial (striped bass) fishery attracts thousands of participants lured by the idea of subsidizing an expensive hobby.”

This striper bill protects the legitimate commercial fisherman and winnows out the “recromercials” that are buying commercial permits to support their recreational fishing habits and to avoid having to comply with more restrictive recreational regulations.

The Massachusetts Marine Fisheries Advisory Commission (MMFAC) sets the rules and regulations for stripers and other fish stocks within state marine waters. Seven of the nine members of the MMFAC have vested financial interests in commercial fishing. Prior to and under their commercially biased control, many of our fisheries, including wild striped bass, have been degraded primarily due to regulated over-harvesting.

In Massachusetts, over 300 years ago, there were hundreds of times more stripers than today and many individual fish were recorded to be in excess of 100 pounds. About 150 years ago, Massachusetts was the epicenter for large striped bass fishing. Many 80-pound-plus fish were documented and, consequently, the Cape and Islands became major tourist attractions creating an entirely new and welcomed economic industry. Even 50 years ago, a 65- or 70-pound bass would get your name in the paper,  while today, because of permitted degradation, a 50-pound striper is a headliner.

We should not be fooled or become complacent with this new diminished norm that is fueled by misleading declarations of having “a fully recovered fishery.” It’s not true and it’s unacceptable.

In fact, according to NOAA data, because of the decline in the recreational striped bass fishery, Massachusetts has lost more than $300 million to $400 million in annual economic activity and hundreds of jobs each year since 2003. Wild striped bass in Massachusetts are regulated to benefit commercial harvesting, not to support the more economically valuable recreational fishery.

If wild striped bass and the economically valuable recreational striped bass fishery are to be protected and saved from ongoing, commercially sourced temptations, then management objectives need to be redefined by the Legislature. This bipartisan bill does that by establishing new policy goals for the MMFAC to implement.

It creates a policy initiative redirecting regulators to manage this limited, valuable species for its greatest financial value to the public and the commonwealth. Doing so will create a robust fishery, regenerate lost jobs and a return to the billion-dollar recreationally based fishing industry we all once enjoyed and hopefully will regain.

http://www.capecodtimes.com/opinion/20180127/massachusetts-mismanages-wild-striped-bass-fishery

While on the topic of fishing, does your license need renewal or are you in need of a new license? (honestly, I did not even know that salt water fishing required a license) Anyway, follow this link for all license needs and questions (on line renewals/applications, costs, locations.)